Antitrust Committee Finds Facebook as Social Network Monopoly

As per the report issued on Tuesday, the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust decided Facebook employs monopoly powers in the social network and has kept up its situation by gaining, duplicating, or killing its rivals. It is one of the four most excellent technology organizations used to increase dominant standing in online inquiry, advertising, social media shopping, and other businesses.

The report from the Democratic majority staff, which also addresses antitrust concerns concerning Amazon, Apple, and Google parent-organization Alphabet, suggests that Congress surveys a progression of possible remedies. It incorporates a “structural separation,” which would require the organizations to part with portions of their organizations. For example, Facebook could be compelled to strip or operationally separate photograph-sharing service Instagram and messaging application WhatsApp, which it acquired.

A 449-page legislative report delivered Tuesday pins Facebook’s massive number of failings on an alarming absence of rivalry in the social networking space. The information results from a 15-month investigation concerning the anticompetitive acts of Facebook, Amazon, Google, and Apple, and is crafted by the bipartisan House Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law.

“Facebook’s monopoly power is firmly entrenched and unlikely to be eroded by competitive pressure from new entrants or existing firms.”

According to the report

Facebook is considered a monopoly because of its substantial organization impacts, high exchanging costs for clients, and the organization’s considerable information advantage.

“One way of looking at this is that what we’re really buying is time. Even if some new competitors spring up, buying Instagram now… will give us a year or more to integrate their dynamics before anyone can get close to their scale again.”

Mark Zuckerberg

Specifically, the report mentioned that Facebook shores up its monopoly by recognizing contenders that could harm the organization and either acquire, duplicate, or kill them. As introduced by the report, one case of this is a 2012 trade among Zuckerberg and his CFO concerning the $1 billion Instagram acquisition.

“Acquisitions are part of every industry and just one way we innovate new technologies to deliver more value to people. Instagram and WhatsApp have reached new heights of success because Facebook has invested billions in those businesses. A strongly competitive landscape existed at the time of both acquisitions and exists today. Regulators thoroughly reviewed each deal and rightly did not see any reason to stop them at the time.”

Facebook Spokesperson

Pssst... Looking to get your story on Future Sharks?